What kinda crrrrap did J get into today...PART 2.
- Thread starter J
- Start date
Hehe thanks.
As far as I know, all 40's are legal, safety or not.
I think the officer driving the car would have been worse off if it had a cage because he would have "felt" more of the impact, but it definitally would have prevented a lot of the intrusion.
Aren't you supposed to be on your honeymoon?! Or is there going to be a "what kinda crrrap did J get into today ... part 3" this time?
haha
mikenacarato
Registered
its interesting to see this thread. this tuesday im riding with a metro nashville officer on my quest to become a LEO.
That One Guy
Registered
So, I'm curious about something. Why do cops seem to think they need Ballistic protection AT THE RANGE???? Are you all afraid that the targets will start shooting back, or are you protecting yourselves against your fellow officers that can't hit the broadside of a barn? 
sleeper
Former LOD President
It has nothing to do with the caliber (unless it's .50 or bigger). As I understand it, if a semi automatic does not have a loaded chamber indicator and an interlock to prevent the weapon from firing without the clip inserted, it is not legal for new sale in California, and if you buy it out of state, not legal to be brought into California. If you bought the gun before the law went into effect, you can keep it (for now). San Francisco tried to ban all handguns, but the NRA took care of that one.
So, I'm curious about something. Why do cops seem to think they need Ballistic protection AT THE RANGE???? Are you all afraid that the targets will start shooting back, or are you protecting yourselves against your fellow officers that can't hit the broadside of a barn?
Lol, its a safety thing to protect from accidental discharges, richochetts, or other n00bs on the other ranges. Its better to be safe then sorry, haha.
That sounds about right.