RE: The Truth
Wow, some of you hardcore guys are really missing the point. I’m sorry if I digress a bit here, but that is only because I have been at work for the last 8 hours, and I will be here for another 8, so this is the first chance I have had to really respond.
First off, Leo, it is that type of post that is inherently not constructive. What was the point of all this talk about not personally targeting people? What was all this talk of coming here because Calvin has personally targeted people? The “Dark Side” was funny for a minute. Let it go. The “lemming” is a poor choice of words. We are supposed to be BEYOND the name calling. You know, in many ways, and according to your definition, anyone who follows an individual blindly, those who followed the Board of Directors here did so blindly, or more importantly, on good faith, can also be subjected to the “lemming“ label. It is impossible to be in someone else’s head Leo, so anyone who follows the direction, or lead, of another must follow so in good will. Just because there are those who do not wish to participate on this board does not mean they are “traitors.” (my word)
Please remember this, many of the rebuttal here has centered around Cal’s insistence on a certain way of things. Let me remind you of what you just said: “Lets just say that those that are refusing to come here and participate in the club and it's official and only message board are those in question.”
I think everyone can infer where that is going.
Mark, Some great ideas, that is a good STARTING point at least.
Leo, your statement that Cal usurped the privileges is NOT of course the whole story. Wouldn’t you agree?
Mark, as far as “forcing their own agenda,” I am trying to steer clear of insinuating that either side has done this, or that either side has any intention of doing so. Let me make this clear, I don’t hold any ill will towards the Lincolns of Distinction Board of Directors, nor do I wish for a complete upheaval. Rather, I want conscientious and intelligent discourse with the members concerning the future of the club. Also, this was not meant to insinuate any mal intent on the part of the BOD concerning the direction of the club.
Alex, it is this type of public openness to compromise that the club needs. I thank you for your public position.
Sharon, I have not had a chance to respond to that quote you put up on this thread. I agree with you 100%. One of the problems with the whole situation has been the new people not knowing anything about the situation, but turning around and making comments like that. Now I knew myself when I posted this, because I have not been around for awhile, that I would be accused of being an hour and a half late to a two hour movie…
However, when I did get back I got an earful, from both sides. It’s all hearsay. Unfortunately, everything anyone has been told, or seen, or discovered is hearsay. So there is no ‘truth’ per say. There are a lot of insinuations and short tempers. You see I can be an hour and a half late to a movie and not like the ending. And yes, maybe I’m an arrogant SOB for thinking I can change the ending, but guess what, I’ll at least try. I have heard some “messed up” things that have been “done” by members on both sides. Each side feels it’s atrocity makes them the hero and the other sides’ supporters “lemmings.” One of the key points I am trying to make is how ridiculous that attitude is when good people have tried to stay neutral- yet have found themselves consumed by the firestorm. My whole point was that no one wants to keep score anymore. There are TOO many people involved. This should have been between Calvin, Alex, and Kale. My call here is to quell the hostility, and for people to look beyond their own “hate.” I also wanted to point out some injustices that I think had sprung up on this board.
Sharon, to you personally I would like to say this: I have never doubted or questioned your tireless service to this club. It is with my deepest regrets that you took this very personally because of my suggestions that new leadership might need to come soon. The call for more resignations was not, and still is not, related in any way to your resignation from the LOD. Nor have I read anything else concerning this. In fact Sharon, when I did sit down to write the above post, you were not even on my mind…=) At no time precipitating this post was your name mentioned or did I view anything pertaining to you. I too will remain your friend. I know this has been a frustrating time for you, and I do not envy your task. The initial post in this thread was not meant to be judgmental or hurtful.
Know this, I told Ray that he needs to stop being so pigheaded as well in the future, especially when it comes to people who, despite their past differences, or how anyone should feel about each other, are now, and at this moment in time, extending the hand of friendship.
Remember, reconciliation is never a mute point.
John, I agree for the most part…=)
Bill, you stole my crayon..=)
Mark, I like the self fulfilling prophecy part…=D Different way of putting things, but still well said.
Leo, I have mentioned the URL on Calvin‘s board and was not suspended, nor was I even warned.
http://pstr-m02.ygpweb.aol.com/data/00A/1A/04/3D/18/l9k57+ruATVfgrS2L26YtFyTvnur2dNK0060.jpg