I have to take my meds every day now!!!

mrrobertstv

Registered
Frequent Ejaculation May Ward Off Prostate Cancer

TUESDAY, April 6 (HealthDayNews) -- Sexually active men are not at a greater risk of developing prostate cancer, a new study says, and frequent ejaculation may reduce their chances of getting the disease.
Previous studies have produced conflicting evidence on the risks or benefits of ejaculation in connection with the development of prostate cancer. Some found that increased sexual activity lowers the risk of the tumors, the second most common form of cancer in American men. Others found just the opposite.

The new study, appearing in the April 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, followed almost 30,000 doctors, dentists, and other health professionals participating in a long-term look at cancer and chronic disease. The men ranged in age from 46 to 81.

As part of the research project, the men, who were mostly white, were asked about their sex life, specifically how frequently they ejaculated -- a question meant to capture not only intercourse but masturbation and nocturnal emissions -- during their 20s, their 40s and in the previous year.

"Not only did [frequent ejaculation] not pose an adverse risk factor, but it possibly could be associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer," said Dr. Michael Leitzmann, an epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute and the leader of the study.

Men who reported between four and seven ejaculations a month over their adult lifetime had an 11 percent lower chance of developing prostate cancer than those who ejaculated no more than three times a month. Every three-ejaculations-per-week increase across a man's lifetime was associated with a 15 percent drop in prostate cancer risk.

The modest effect of occasional ejaculation could simply illustrate that it doesn't raise the risk of prostate cancer, Leitzmann and his colleagues said.

But men who ejaculated at least 21 times a month had a 33 percent lower chance of developing prostate cancer, suggesting that frequent ejaculation does indeed protect the prostate from growing tumors.

However, the number of cancer cases in this small group was itself small -- only 60 out of the 1,449 cases overall, undercutting the strength of the finding.

Men who reported such frequent ejaculation in the year before entering the study got even more protection against cancer. Again, however, the number of tumor cases in this group was tiny.

How frequent ejaculation might protect the prostate, a walnut-sized gland that provides the liquid medium for sperm during emission, isn't known. The researchers suggest that ejaculation could help purge the prostate of cancer-causing chemicals or stunt the formation of crystalloids that have been linked to tumors in some men.

Another, more speculative, possibility is that the relief of stress associated with ejaculation could lead to hormonal activity that's less likely to promote cancerous changes in the gland.

Until scientists learn more about how the prostate benefits from frequent ejaculation, Leitzmann said, it's too early to recommend that men step up their sexual activity.

"Our study should stimulate progress toward [understanding the mechanism] as opposed to putting out a public health recommendation," he said.

Dr. Graham Giles, an Australian cancer researcher who has looked at sexual activity and prostate cancer risk, said the latest study "goes a long way to confirm" his own group's findings that frequency of ejaculation and prostate tumors are inversely connected.

"Very few studies, like this one and ours, have measured total ejaculations," Giles said. "Most have relied solely on the frequency of sexual intercourse, and therefore probably missed measuring a lot of male sexual activity."

Neither Giles' study nor the most recent one looked at the ejaculation frequency during adolescence -- a period that's worth considering, both Giles and Leitzmann said.

"These [years] may be crucial" in dictating the fate of the prostate, Giles said. "It is very possible that the risk of developing cancer later in life is set up much earlier in life, when the gland is developing."

Meanwhile, another new study finds that a common screening test for prostate cancer can help predict whether the disease will return in men who were initially treated with hormonal therapy.

Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston found that different rises and falls in levels of the blood test -- protein-specific antigen, or PSA -- are key.

The study of 1,454 men with prostate cancer, which appears in the April 7 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found that the risk of death from the disease was 13 times higher in those whose PSA levels rose quickly and then fell slowly after hormonal therapy compared to those whose levels rose slowly and fell quickly.
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

Stan,
I'm just glad to see Doctors are not treating this with a "hands off" policy. Just get a grip on yourself and you should be able to handle this problem by yourself. Buck up and grab this problem by the head and shoulders, millions of men have had to hold up their heads and face this problem by themselves daliy, but most can handled it. Good Luck, most of us are pulling for ourselves. ;)


** Bill **
1995 LSC-R'ed w/Recaro's and Cobra R's
Veteran of Carlisle 2000/01/02/03
[a href=//cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=258112]For Pic's and Mods click here[/a]

...If you can read this, thank a teacher...If it's in English, thank a veteran....
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

Like Dave Chappell stated: I'm going to beat my meat like it owes me money!!!
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

I just fell off my chair! Classic. Need to change the "handle" from The Evil One, to the Happy One, or Busy One. lol.
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

Yeah, but you are not a real professional unless you can switch hands and gain a stroke.
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

A couple of years ago we had a new product meeting with several executives. One of the products shown was a “Forever Flashlight.” This device has a blue LED (Light Emitting Diode) bulb and a built in generator. It does not need batteries. To activate the generator and charge up the capacitors inside, you shook the flashlight up and down parallel to its long direction with one hand. This action moved a magnetic mass of considerable weight through a wire coil which generated energy. Several shakes of the flashlight generated enough energy for about 1 minute of fair quality light. There were rubber bumpers on the inside ends that protected the clear plastic body from being damaged by the suddenly stopping magnet.

So imagine if you will several MALE executives, all around a meeting table “whacking off” this flash light. The flash light was passed hand to hand around the table while there was an engineering presentation, cost studies, etc. There were two woman executives in the meeting room who watched the flash light being passed around.

I was watching the women’s reaction to the “flashlight evaluation.” One woman didn’t notice anything at all odd about the actions of the males around the table. However, the other lady had this confused look on her face as if she was searching for some thought that was eluding her. Suddenly she had it. Her eyes went wide and her face went a bright red. And she caught me smiling at her sudden discovery. When the flash light came to her position, she needed no engineering evaluation and passed it on to the person next to her, trying real hard not to smile, herself.

After the meeting, as she was walking out, she confided: “I guess we know who has the dirty minds in this meeting.”

http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/lights/5a9f/?cpg=INK487
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

A couple of years ago we had a new product meeting with several executives. One of the products shown was a “Forever Flashlight.” This device has a blue LED (Light Emitting Diode) bulb and a built in generator. It does not need batteries. To activate the generator and charge up the capacitors inside, you shook the flashlight up and down parallel to its long direction with one hand. This action moved a magnetic mass of considerable weight through a wire coil which generated energy. Several shakes of the flashlight generated enough energy for about 1 minute of fair quality light. There were rubber bumpers on the inside ends that protected the clear plastic body from being damaged by the suddenly stopping magnet.

So imagine if you will several MALE executives, all around a meeting table “whacking off” this flash light. The flash light was passed hand to hand around the table while there was an engineering presentation, cost studies, etc. There were two woman executives in the meeting room who watched the flash light being passed around.

I was watching the women’s reaction to the “flashlight evaluation.” One woman didn’t notice anything at all odd about the actions of the males around the table. However, the other lady had this confused look on her face as if she was searching for some thought that was eluding her. Suddenly she had it. Her eyes went wide and her face went a bright red. And she caught me smiling at her sudden discovery. When the flash light came to her position, she needed no engineering evaluation and passed it on to the person next to her, trying real hard not to smile, herself.

After the meeting, as she was walking out, she confided: “I guess we know who has the dirty minds in this meeting.”

http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/lights/5a9f/?cpg=INK487

That's funny.
 
RE: I have to take my meds every day now!!!

By the way, I received one of these flashlights for Christmas this year. So there I was, Christmas morning, whacking it off for the first time, trying to get enough energy stored up to see if it was working. It wasn’t – the ON switch was misaligned. I fixed that and soon got the light glowing brightly.

Daughter #1, the senior computer geek for Pier One headquarters here in Fort Worth was watching me, looking very bored. She didn’t have a clue what it looked like I was doing.

Daughter #2, the animation artist and temporary Blockbuster employee was grinning from ear to ear. She knew exactly what it looked like.

Go figure.
 
Back
Top