Cts-v

Stone17

Stone17

Registered
I did not launch hard off the line.

.429------ Reaction
2.214----- 60Ft
5.967---- 330Ft
8.969--- 1/8Et
83.52----1/8Mph
11.525---1000RT
13.667---1/4ET
105.51----1/4MPH

.524------ Reaction
2.223----- 60Ft
5.904---- 330Ft
8.845--- 1/8Et
84.93----1/8Mph
11.371---1000RT
13.490---1/4ET
106.53----1/4MPH

Video.


 
Those times mirror the times I was clocking with my new 1970 Cuda 440 Automatic with
F7014 Goodyear Wideoval street tires on it. I wasnt quite "pure stock" in that it had Hooker headers (open) and a modified 3310 780 CFM Holly carb on it, and my own home built centrifical advance distributor and a Vericam.
 
Gotta love Glen's camera phone pictures, haha. I can see it now...."Hey dude, here's my phone, take a picture of me when I launch." :p
 
driller said:
With a 2.2 sixty foot time, it builds momentum down the track rather nicely. :)
Click to expand...

I did not want to do this

IMG_20100825_165919.jpg


The rear end in the 04-05 CTS-V break easy on take off.
 
Last edited:
whiplash15 said:
Those times mirror the times I was clocking with my new 1970 Cuda 440 Automatic with
F7014 Goodyear Wideoval street tires on it. I wasnt quite "pure stock" in that it had Hooker headers (open) and a modified 3310 780 CFM Holly carb on it, and my own home built centrifical advance distributor and a Vericam.
Click to expand...

and only gets 5 mpg :p
 
Last edited:
Actually I was getting a bit better than that, but still nothing to write home about...And that was back when 104 octane premium was 50 cents a gallon. OMG! What a mess that is. I sure hope it was under warranty.
 
Stone17 said:
You still rolling in the S2000. I'll kick your ass then :D
Click to expand...

Yep. Not with that wimpy burn out. You didn't even heat up your tires! All you did was make them slick, if you're gonna burn out, do a good one. :D. Based on you're ET it would be close. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top