I am not familiar with any stock Mark that could lay down a 14.6. A 14.8 is an astounding time, with 15.0+ being the average. A 14.6 with 4.10s on a Gen II sounds just about correct to me.
I went 14.7 with a 2.1 60' in my 98 LSC. Only thing I had was 17" Cobra R's with 255/40/r17 BFG KDW2's all around. I know the tires helped the 60' but because they are a smaller diameter it made me hit the rev limiter in 2nd towards the end of the track. On that run I even lifted at around 5k rpm in 2nd hoping that with the hesitation maybe the car would shift instead of bounce off the limiter. It had been hitting the limiter a little ways before the line, so I was thinking shifting might actually be faster. I know the tires helped, but did they really help that much? It was a 14.7001 run, so not 14.6 but close enough that it aggrivated me a lil bit lol.
Something doesn't add up here... I have NEVER seen a stock geared Mark VIII go 14.7@91.X let along with a 2.1 60ft. They were always at 95/96/97 and especially with the larger heavier wheels.
It certainly sounds like either gears... or converter were changed.... but you did mention that you finish in 2nd hmm... since most LSCs finish in 3rd ...
Do you have the timeslip I want to compare your 1000' 1/8 mile etc with mine, this is very interesting.
Well somebody's car has to be the fastest, right? Maybe yours is one of those one in a thousand cars.
To check the stall speed, put your foot on the brake and bring up the rpms, once the tires start to spin and burn out that point is where your stall is.
mine finished in 2nd gear at 6500 rpms. a shorter stickier, tire = a lil higher gear ratio and better 60'. Almost 2 inches shorter would be like having at least 3.55's in the car.
How exactly does a stock engine rev beyond 6000? Computer prompts shifts at 5800 or so.