Misanthropy
Information Junkie
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-emissions26-2009jan26,0,3460961.story
Thoughts? here are some of mine:
It might help develop new technology for the future things if there are more regulatory standards for tailpipe emissions. Such as new technologies are mainly developed during ware fare and crisis. We all know egr and cats just make it harder for the engine to work on the standard vehicle, increasing restriction and raising overall temperature, thinning out and "capturing" carbon on the release. The way I see it if the carbon is thinner it helps people with breathing problems but at the same time it's friggin thinner, meaning harder to filter by our bodies on the way to the lungs and has less density making it easier to rise near the ozone where it does damage? the denser is it the closer it is to the ocean where most of our air is returned as oxygen.
It would force people to buy new cars (I know he has thought of this one which seems fuken crooked, but hell what isn't nowadays) or find an alternative means of filtering the cars. This puts strain on the mostly white community of car enthusiasts, the poor like me that buy beaters to beat up sometimes, and the elderly that just have that old vehicle and live on a fixed income.
Increasing technology five fold takes out jobs for the non schooled mechanic forcing him into another area of expertise. Increasing fuel mileage for the big three right now means less weight a little more technology (seems like they focus on a bunch of useless push buttons now) which means unless there is a super plastic your going to die when a steel car hits you.
I mean there are tons of pros and cons like the opposite of the car being lighter is "oh it still has a steel frame" and if anything of a certain speed hits you are dead anyhow. There was a Ferrari that crashed going over 200mph and the car disintegrated on him, leaving him unharmed. Fact being the cheaper the car even if it gets good mpg its designed like crap.
Or to my statement of schooled mechanics, they would be smarter and then be more qualified to work on cars.
So there is always a negative adjacent to our +.
Looking for opinions.
Thoughts? here are some of mine:
It might help develop new technology for the future things if there are more regulatory standards for tailpipe emissions. Such as new technologies are mainly developed during ware fare and crisis. We all know egr and cats just make it harder for the engine to work on the standard vehicle, increasing restriction and raising overall temperature, thinning out and "capturing" carbon on the release. The way I see it if the carbon is thinner it helps people with breathing problems but at the same time it's friggin thinner, meaning harder to filter by our bodies on the way to the lungs and has less density making it easier to rise near the ozone where it does damage? the denser is it the closer it is to the ocean where most of our air is returned as oxygen.
It would force people to buy new cars (I know he has thought of this one which seems fuken crooked, but hell what isn't nowadays) or find an alternative means of filtering the cars. This puts strain on the mostly white community of car enthusiasts, the poor like me that buy beaters to beat up sometimes, and the elderly that just have that old vehicle and live on a fixed income.
Increasing technology five fold takes out jobs for the non schooled mechanic forcing him into another area of expertise. Increasing fuel mileage for the big three right now means less weight a little more technology (seems like they focus on a bunch of useless push buttons now) which means unless there is a super plastic your going to die when a steel car hits you.
I mean there are tons of pros and cons like the opposite of the car being lighter is "oh it still has a steel frame" and if anything of a certain speed hits you are dead anyhow. There was a Ferrari that crashed going over 200mph and the car disintegrated on him, leaving him unharmed. Fact being the cheaper the car even if it gets good mpg its designed like crap.
Or to my statement of schooled mechanics, they would be smarter and then be more qualified to work on cars.
So there is always a negative adjacent to our +.
Looking for opinions.