Raybestos Ceramic VS Monroe Ceramic pads?

L

LCromwell

New member
I'm am trying to find out which one you guys prefer (Raybestos Ceramic VS Monroe Ceramic pads) if any of you actually use either? I am a daily driver no racing. Just around town and occasional 200 mile trips.
Also I may have to replace rotors or have existing turned. Again what is a good no warp but inexpensive rotors, if I have to buy new ones. Understand this is a replacement car I bought so previous history is almost non existant. I don't need cross drilled and all that high performance stuff. Just a good set of no warp rotors.
Thanks in advance for your replys.:)
 
Mike P

Mike P

c:enter
Staff member
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 4s, better than J's! : Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B179 Safari/7534.48.3)

I think raybestos would be but I'm sure I could be wrong. I thought someone told me they're one of the best brands
 
B

beerdog

New member
I would go with Reybestos from those 2 choices since Reybestos is a brake parts company. I would nto be suprised if some other company makes both. They would both be considered run of the mill pads. There are allot of choices for brake pads.
 
driller

driller

El Presidente
Non-performance daily drivers should get the best MotorCraft rotors and run-of-the-mill organic brake pads for optimum life. It is easy and cheap to replace the pads. With proper maintenance, the rotors will outlast several sets of organic pads.

Ceramic pads will last longer and offer similar benefits but are more costly.

To answer the OP's brand question, I choose Raybestos.
 
X

XLRVIII

New member
driller said:
Ceramic pads will last longer and offer similar benefits but are more costly.
Click to expand...
I agree with everything Driller posted, and would like to add.
The ceramic pads do last longer, but at the cost of decreasing the life of your rotor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top