What was Ford's rationale for switching to coil-on-plug ignition in the late 90s?
Switching from 2 to 8 coils almost certainly made the engines more expensive to build. And not only are there 4 times as many parts to potentially break, but they are completely exposed to vibration and heat from the engine.
The only advantages I can think of is that the engine will still run if 1 or 2 coils fail, and there's no risk of current leakage or arcing between the plug wires. But since coils and wires aren't really a problem in modern cars, it seems like coil-on-plug systems fail to solve a problem that didn't exist in the first place. What am I missing?
Switching from 2 to 8 coils almost certainly made the engines more expensive to build. And not only are there 4 times as many parts to potentially break, but they are completely exposed to vibration and heat from the engine.
The only advantages I can think of is that the engine will still run if 1 or 2 coils fail, and there's no risk of current leakage or arcing between the plug wires. But since coils and wires aren't really a problem in modern cars, it seems like coil-on-plug systems fail to solve a problem that didn't exist in the first place. What am I missing?