OK, set backs and programmable and learning thermostats. Everyone from the users to the energy suppliers say that using a set back thermostat saves money. Here's the thing though... Can someone show me proof? I have for years wondered why and how we are saving money by this practice.
I have simple questions:
- Setting the thermostat to 70 or set to 65... does it take more energy to MAINTAIN 70 than it does 65? In other words does it take more energy to MAINTAIN a high temperature (70) as opposed to a low temperature(65)? Seems to me it shouldn't make any difference.
- Setting the thermostat down several degrees at night then having to raise the heat in the morning. Does it use less to maintain the lower setting and bring it back up? Or does it actually use more fuel to bring the temperature up to comfort? Never mind the comfort factor at night, I'm just talking fuel or gas use here.
- If going away for a few days does it save to reduce the temp to say 50 or leave it at 68? If it costs no more to maintain temperatures then why bother and have to come home to a cold house with a chill that will take a few hours to heat up?
I have simple questions:
- Setting the thermostat to 70 or set to 65... does it take more energy to MAINTAIN 70 than it does 65? In other words does it take more energy to MAINTAIN a high temperature (70) as opposed to a low temperature(65)? Seems to me it shouldn't make any difference.
- Setting the thermostat down several degrees at night then having to raise the heat in the morning. Does it use less to maintain the lower setting and bring it back up? Or does it actually use more fuel to bring the temperature up to comfort? Never mind the comfort factor at night, I'm just talking fuel or gas use here.
- If going away for a few days does it save to reduce the temp to say 50 or leave it at 68? If it costs no more to maintain temperatures then why bother and have to come home to a cold house with a chill that will take a few hours to heat up?